Episode Thumbnail
Episode 187  |  46:16 min

Why the PMA Process is so Dreaded by Manufacturers in the US Market

Episode 187  |  46:16 min  |  03.25.2021

Why the PMA Process is so Dreaded by Manufacturers in the US Market

00:00
00:00
This is a podcast episode titled, Why the PMA Process is so Dreaded by Manufacturers in the US Market. The summary for this episode is: <p><span style="background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Premarket Approval (PMA) is a FDA regulatory pathway designated for Class III medical devices that has historically been known to evoke a fearful, negative response by medical device professionals.</span></p><p><span style="background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">In this episode of the Global Medical Device Podcast, Jon Speer talks to David Pudwill, known in the industry as Mr. Regulatory, about the reasons why the PMA process is so dreaded by manufacturers bringing a Class III medical device to market in the United States.</span></p>

Premarket Approval (PMA) is a FDA regulatory pathway designated for Class III medical devices that has historically been known to evoke a fearful, negative response by medical device professionals.

In this episode of the Global Medical Device Podcast, Jon Speer talks to David Pudwill, known in the industry as Mr. Regulatory, about the reasons why the PMA process is so dreaded by manufacturers bringing a Class III medical device to market in the United States.

Some highlights of this episode include:

  • The tendency toward the Class III PMA still creates complications and rejection from executives in the medical device industry. Why? Timeframe and quality. 
  • Companies not equipped to accommodate and manage the PMA process fear  challenges the FDA will present, uncertainty about clinical study outcomes, or if a product meets unmet needs to do well in the market.
  • Product classification concerns include inner-dependencies, such as reimbursement that does not sufficiently match manufacturing/distribution costs. 
  • Historical precedent determines when a product requires a PMA. It depends on what was on the market and how the FDA classified it.
  • Originally, PMA was intended to be for new products coming to market and 510(k) was meant for minor changes to existing products. Now, the 510(k) pathway is the more robust option based on the number of submissions. 
  • The PMA path provides plenty of advantages, such as real intrinsic value and protections. It is the regulatory equivalent of having a patent.
  • A common misconception is PMA products can be substantially equivalent to a 510(k). Unless a PMA is down-classified, it remains a PMA for future devices.
  • Before choosing PMA, consider classification based on risk, compare existing products, and review real world evidence, effectiveness criteria, and user fees.

Memorable quotes from David Pudwill:

“There’s a fear, I think, of what challenges FDA is going to present, or there’s the uncertainty about the clinical study outcomes, or whether this is really going to successfully meet the unmet need well enough to do well in the market.”

“The key thing for me that’s a concern when you’re talking about product classification is really around reimbursement and whether you have an existing reimbursement pathway or whether you’re going to have to forge your own path.”

”At the FDA, one of the key things is they don’t necessarily have a good sense of how much things cost.”

“There’s nothing more permanent than a temporary government program.”

“It’s never too early to make sure that you have a robust quality system in place.”

More Episodes

Past, Present, Future State (and World) of Quality in the Medical Device Industry

Focusing on the Intent of the UDI Requirements from FDA's Final Guidance Doc

Addressing the 'Who, What, When' of Quality in the Medical Device Industry

Meet a Guru: Maryann Mitchell

Why Storytelling Matters for Medical Device Companies

A Breakthrough Device that Aims to Prevent Osteoporosis