Episode Thumbnail
Episode 57  |  34:17 min

What Substantial Equivalence Means as It Applies to 510(k)'s & Why It's So Important

Episode 57  |  34:17 min  |  11.07.2019

What Substantial Equivalence Means as It Applies to 510(k)'s & Why It's So Important

00:00
00:00
This is a podcast episode titled, What Substantial Equivalence Means as It Applies to 510(k)'s & Why It's So Important. The summary for this episode is: Do you have a firm grasp and understanding of what substantial equivalence means in regards to the 510(k)? Many don’t understand it; the evidence is the large percentage of submissions that are rejected due to a lack of demonstrating substantial equivalence. Today we’re talking with Mike Drues, President of Vascular Sciences about demonstrating substantial equivalence, so if you’re not rock-solid on the concept, you won’t want to miss this episode. Some of the highlights of the show include: ● Exactly what substantial equivalence means as it applies to the regulatory process and why it’s important. ● Why it’s challenging to demonstrate substantial equivalence. ● Mike’s approach to evaluating and demonstrating substantial equivalence. ● Some of the common errors that Mike sees in submissions that pertain to substantial equivalence. ● What happens if you get it wrong in the eyes of the FDA. ● An explanation of product codes and how they relate to substantial equivalence. ● Examples of how you might demonstrate substantial equivalence between common objects - stressing their similarities while de-emphasizing their differences.
Do you have a firm grasp and understanding of what substantial equivalence means in regards to the 510(k)? Many don’t understand it; the evidence is the large percentage of submissions that are rejected due to a lack of demonstrating substantial equivalence. Today we’re talking with Mike Drues, President of Vascular Sciences about demonstrating substantial equivalence, so if you’re not rock-solid on the concept, you won’t want to miss this episode. Some of the highlights of the show include: ● Exactly what substantial equivalence means as it applies to the regulatory process and why it’s important. ● Why it’s challenging to demonstrate substantial equivalence. ● Mike’s approach to evaluating and demonstrating substantial equivalence. ● Some of the common errors that Mike sees in submissions that pertain to substantial equivalence. ● What happens if you get it wrong in the eyes of the FDA. ● An explanation of product codes and how they relate to substantial equivalence. ● Examples of how you might demonstrate substantial equivalence between common objects - stressing their similarities while de-emphasizing their differences.

More Episodes

Focusing on the Intent of the UDI Requirements from FDA's Final Guidance Doc

Addressing the 'Who, What, When' of Quality in the Medical Device Industry

Meet a Guru: Maryann Mitchell

Why Storytelling Matters for Medical Device Companies

A Breakthrough Device that Aims to Prevent Osteoporosis

Understanding FDA's New Intended Use Rule and its Implications